From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-115772-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9176 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2004 09:19:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9107 invoked by uid 48); 26 Oct 2004 09:19:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:19:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041026091901.9106.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040916205430.17526.wanderer@rsu.ru>
References: <20040916205430.17526.wanderer@rsu.ru>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/17526] [4.0 Regression] libcpp is miscompiled with -fno-pcc-struct-return -O2
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg03159.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-26 09:18 -------
Andrew's example in comment #26 is broken.
ret.cd is set to 2 and therefore we have a.b.cd!=1 which triggers the abort.

Nevertheless, here's a reduced testcase derived from comment #25:

================================
void abort(void);

typedef struct { int i; } A;

A foo(void)
{
  A a = { 1 };
  int j;
  for (j=0; j<2; j++) ;
  return a;
}

void bar(A *p)
{
  *p = foo();
}

int main(void)
{
  A a;
  bar(&a);
  if (a.i != 1)
    abort();
  return 0;
}
================================


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
           Keywords|                            |monitored


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17526