From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-115803-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26746 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2004 13:37:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26732 invoked by uid 48); 26 Oct 2004 13:37:24 -0000
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:37:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041026133724.26731.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20021025133601.8361.gerald@pfeifer.com>
References: <20021025133601.8361.gerald@pfeifer.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/8361] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg03190.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-26 13:37 -------
No, Nathan just got confused on which attachment to take.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8361