From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14597 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2004 01:16:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14578 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2004 01:16:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 01:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041028011606.14577.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "wilson at tuliptree dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041015111408.18010.davidm@hpl.hp.com> References: <20041015111408.18010.davidm@hpl.hp.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/18010] bad unwind info due to multiple returns (missing epilogue) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg03409.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2004-10-28 01:16 ------- Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns (missing epilogue) On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 04:05, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote: > Command: /home/davidm/src/gcc/gcc/cc1 -quiet -iprefix /home/davidm/src/gcc/gcc/. > ./lib/gcc/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.0.0/ -isystem /home/davidm/src/gcc/gcc/includ > e /r/wailua/usr/src/misc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c -q > uiet -dumpbase 20001226-1.c -auxbase-strip 20001226-1.o -Os -w -o /tmp/ccR2zJ8h. Perhaps I should have read your message closer. I get timeouts for this testcase also. However, it bootstraps fine, and the total number of unexpected gcc failures is only 45, which is really not that bad when you consider that there is no one actively maintaining the IA-64 port. Only 4 of these are timeouts. Are you seeing worse results than this? I agree the results should be better, but there is only so much I can do in the limited time I have available for IA-64 gcc work. If you think I should be spending more time looking at gcc testsuite results, I can try shifting my priorities. I've mostly been trying to respond to bug reports, and not worrying about the testsuite results. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18010