public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "davidm at hpl dot hp dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/18010] bad unwind info due to multiple returns (missing epilogue)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041028092452.26861.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041015111408.18010.davidm@hpl.hp.com>


------- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com  2004-10-28 09:24 -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Perhaps I should have read your message closer.  I get timeouts for this
> testcase also.  However, it bootstraps fine, and the total number of
> unexpected gcc failures is only 45, which is really not that bad when
> you consider that there is no one actively maintaining the IA-64 port. 
> Only 4 of these are timeouts.  Are you seeing worse results than this? 

Yes, it's worse but not nearly as bad as I thought.  If I let the test-suite
complete, I get:

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            30227
# of unexpected failures        115
# of unexpected successes       3
# of expected failures          82
# of unresolved testcases       52
# of untested testcases         28
# of unsupported tests          498

Perhaps the additional failures are due to the fact that my machine is running
Debian/unstable.  Anyhow, this clearly isn't as bad as I thought.  I saw a
couple of timeouts in a row and since that took quite some time, I thought it
was hopeless.  I should have been more patient.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18010


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-10-28  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-15 11:14 [Bug target/18010] New: " davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
2004-10-15 11:15 ` [Bug target/18010] " davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
2004-10-19  1:07 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
2004-10-19 18:08 ` davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
2004-10-21 18:03 ` davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
2004-10-21 18:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-22 10:57 ` davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
2004-10-25 23:54 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
2004-10-26  0:06 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
2004-10-26  8:49 ` davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
2004-10-27  1:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-27  1:48 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-27 11:05 ` davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
2004-10-27 19:51 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
2004-10-28  1:16 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
2004-10-28  9:24 ` davidm at hpl dot hp dot com [this message]
2004-10-29 22:00 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
2004-11-04 18:07 ` davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
2004-11-24 22:24 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041028092452.26861.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).