public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/18216] New: Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
@ 2004-10-29 10:23 dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
2004-10-29 10:25 ` [Bug c++/18216] " dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dkouroun at mailbox dot gr @ 2004-10-29 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The README files in the tarball, show that when an array is declared
double V[N];
or
double* V = new double[N];
computations with values stored in that array give different results!
Should floating point calculations with values stored in an array
depend on the way that array has been allocated? Both g++-3.4.2
and icc-8.1.022 exhibit similar behaviour with icc being both more
accurate and much faster on a pentium4 Laptop.
--
Summary: Different results when an array is
statically/dynamically allocated
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/18216] Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
2004-10-29 10:23 [Bug c++/18216] New: Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
@ 2004-10-29 10:25 ` dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
2004-10-29 11:36 ` [Bug target/18216] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dkouroun at mailbox dot gr @ 2004-10-29 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dkouroun at mailbox dot gr 2004-10-29 10:25 -------
Created an attachment (id=7427)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7427&action=view)
source code and the results in README.1, README.2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18216] Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
2004-10-29 10:23 [Bug c++/18216] New: Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
2004-10-29 10:25 ` [Bug c++/18216] " dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
@ 2004-10-29 11:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-29 13:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-29 13:27 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-29 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 11:36 -------
This might be related to PR 17990.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c++ |target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18216] Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
2004-10-29 10:23 [Bug c++/18216] New: Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
2004-10-29 10:25 ` [Bug c++/18216] " dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
2004-10-29 11:36 ` [Bug target/18216] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-29 13:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-29 13:27 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-29 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-29 13:06 -------
The source is not fully compilable. You missed the timing.h header.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18216] Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
2004-10-29 10:23 [Bug c++/18216] New: Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-29 13:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-29 13:27 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-10-29 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-10-29 13:27 -------
I can't compile your code, due to this:
g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4.3-pre/bin/c++ main1.cc
main1.cc:3:20: timing.h: No such file or directory
main1.cc:9: error: `R' does not name a type
main1.cc: In function `int main(int, char**)':
main1.cc:20: error: `indexType' does not name a type
main1.cc:21: error: `indexType' undeclared (first use this function)
main1.cc:21: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each
function it appears in.)
main1.cc:21: error: expected `;' before "i"
[...]
The file timing.h isn't in your tarball.
But besides that, can you try to come up with a smaller and more obvious
testcase? You may be able to merge everything into one file which would
make things more obvious.
Thanks
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18216] Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
[not found] <bug-18216-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-09-10 8:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-10 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I get no difference between statically allocated V or dynamically allocated.
I do get a difference with -m32 and -m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse (which is exactly
the difference between ICC and GCC).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18216] Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated
[not found] <bug-18216-9399@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-06 18:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-06 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-10 8:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-29 10:23 [Bug c++/18216] New: Different results when an array is statically/dynamically allocated dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
2004-10-29 10:25 ` [Bug c++/18216] " dkouroun at mailbox dot gr
2004-10-29 11:36 ` [Bug target/18216] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-29 13:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-29 13:27 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
[not found] <bug-18216-9399@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-06 18:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-18216-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-09-10 8:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).