From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-116489-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1419 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2004 03:40:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1412 invoked by uid 48); 31 Oct 2004 03:40:03 -0000
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 03:40:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041031034003.1411.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20041022033858.18106.aaronavay62@aaronwl.com>
References: <20041022033858.18106.aaronavay62@aaronwl.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/18106] Weak symbols are unimplemented on Windows
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg03876.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com  2004-10-31 03:40 -------
As of 2004-10-25, weak symbols will break libstdc++-v3.  See
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02723.html>.  I'm not sure what to
do about this yet.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18106