* [Bug libobjc/18255] Protocols are not initialized correctly
2004-10-31 17:13 [Bug libobjc/18255] New: Protocols are not initialized correctly tilo at pruetz dot net
@ 2004-10-31 18:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-31 19:06 ` [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-31 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Severity|critical |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly
2004-10-31 17:13 [Bug libobjc/18255] New: Protocols are not initialized correctly tilo at pruetz dot net
2004-10-31 18:45 ` [Bug libobjc/18255] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-31 19:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-31 19:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-31 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-31 19:06 -------
Confirmed, the problem is in the front-end, not marking the protocol a for being initialization.
Note this only effects the GNU runtime.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|libobjc |objc
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-31 19:06:16
date| |
Summary|Protocols are not |[GNU runtime] Protocols are
|initialized correctly |not initialized correctly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly
2004-10-31 17:13 [Bug libobjc/18255] New: Protocols are not initialized correctly tilo at pruetz dot net
2004-10-31 18:45 ` [Bug libobjc/18255] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-31 19:06 ` [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-31 19:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-31 19:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-31 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-31 19:10 -------
L_OBJC_PROTOCOL_a should be added to L_OBJC_STATIC_INSTANCES.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly
2004-10-31 17:13 [Bug libobjc/18255] New: Protocols are not initialized correctly tilo at pruetz dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-31 19:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-31 19:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-31 22:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-31 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-31 19:26 -------
The bug is in objc_build_protocol_expr, I will figure out how to fix this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly
2004-10-31 17:13 [Bug libobjc/18255] New: Protocols are not initialized correctly tilo at pruetz dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-31 19:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-31 22:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-31 22:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-31 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-31 22:47 -------
Patch here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02773.html>. I don't know if it applies
to the 3.4 branch at all. And don't know if this is a regression (I will check tomorrow).
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly
2004-10-31 17:13 [Bug libobjc/18255] New: Protocols are not initialized correctly tilo at pruetz dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-31 22:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-31 22:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-22 17:36 ` tilo at pruetz dot net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-31 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly
2004-10-31 17:13 [Bug libobjc/18255] New: Protocols are not initialized correctly tilo at pruetz dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-10-31 22:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-22 17:36 ` tilo at pruetz dot net
2004-12-12 4:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tilo at pruetz dot net @ 2004-11-22 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tilo at pruetz dot net 2004-11-22 17:36 -------
Will this get fixed in the 3.4 branch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly
2004-10-31 17:13 [Bug libobjc/18255] New: Protocols are not initialized correctly tilo at pruetz dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-22 17:36 ` tilo at pruetz dot net
@ 2004-12-12 4:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-03 13:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-01 9:02 ` tilo at pruetz dot net
9 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-12 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-12 04:33 -------
Most likely not as I think it was broke with 2.95.3 also (but I have to check). I also need to update the
patch for the comments.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|patch |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly
2004-10-31 17:13 [Bug libobjc/18255] New: Protocols are not initialized correctly tilo at pruetz dot net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-12 4:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-03 13:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-01 9:02 ` tilo at pruetz dot net
9 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-03 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-03 13:50 -------
*** Bug 23214 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jeremy at deadbeef dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly
2004-10-31 17:13 [Bug libobjc/18255] New: Protocols are not initialized correctly tilo at pruetz dot net
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-03 13:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-01 9:02 ` tilo at pruetz dot net
9 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tilo at pruetz dot net @ 2005-10-01 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tilo at pruetz dot net 2005-10-01 09:01 -------
Is there any hope that this bug will be fixed in a GCC release?
It really sucks to have to patch every new installed release.
What can I do to make the fix do it's way into a GCC release?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread