From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7757 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2004 03:08:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7730 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2004 03:08:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 03:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041101030805.7729.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041101022250.18262.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041101022250.18262.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/18262] [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fails X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-11-01 03:08 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fa > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Known to fail|3.4.3 4.0.0 |3.4.3 Yes, this is in some way specific to 3.4.3. The test results on 4.0.0 on this system are: === libstdc++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread-1.cc execution test XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors) FAIL: ext/concept_checks.cc (test for excess errors) WARNING: ext/concept_checks.cc compilation failed to produce executable === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes 3053 # of unexpected failures 1 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 5 Compiler version: 4.0.0 20041028 (experimental) Platform: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu These results are with a LD_LIBRARY_PATH patch that I have been testing. It's possible that the fails are a configuration issue. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18262