public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/16797] Opportunity to remove unnecessary load instructions Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:40:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20041103144053.2497.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20040728170038.16797.steinmtz@us.ibm.com> ------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-03 14:40 ------- ug. This bug falls between a number of stools. 1) on ppc-64 ints are returned correctly sign extended to 64 bits 2) the tree-ssa optimizers are blind to parameter marshalling, so the necessary sign extension is added at the tree->rtl conversion 3) When combine runs, there is still one common exit block containing i_64 = contents_of_i i_32 = (int)i_64 result = sign_extend (i_32) As the 'contents_of_i' are initialized in different blocks, combine has no knowledge of its possible values. So, it doesn't know the truncation and extension is a nop. 4) The terminating bb gets duplicated by bbro right at the end of optimization. No subsequent cse stage runs after that. If tree-ssa was made ABI aware, we'd be in much better shape. This is similar to 16802 but with bb-cloning to further expose the stupidity -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16797
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-03 14:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-07-28 17:00 [Bug other/16797] New: PowerPC - " gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-28 17:36 ` [Bug target/16797] " bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-07-28 18:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/16797] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-30 18:11 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-03 14:40 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2004-11-08 14:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-08 14:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-02 18:47 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-10 17:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-16797-8614@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2005-11-02 17:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 4:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-16797-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2014-12-15 19:17 ` spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20041103144053.2497.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).