From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14708 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2004 22:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14689 invoked by uid 48); 7 Nov 2004 22:13:37 -0000 Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 22:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041107221337.14687.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040518194300.15524.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040518194300.15524.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/15524] [4.0 Regression] jump threading on trees is slow with switch statements with large # of cases X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00851.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-07 22:13 ------- It seems that connect_infinite_loops_to_exit is the next bottleneck for this test case. Probably not important enough to care about for GCC 4.0 (would *any* real-world code ever consist of 30000-odd infinite loops in a single switch statement? ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15524