public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/13091] New: invalide bytecode with package-private class
@ 2003-11-17 22:14 tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-11-17 22:15 ` [Bug java/13091] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-17 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2003-11/msg00157.html

gcj generates invalid bytecode for this test.
gcj's output references B.m(), not C.m().

I believe for binary compatibility we ought to reference
C.m() anyway, since adding a hiding C.m() method still
preserves binary compatibility.

-- 
           Summary: invalide bytecode with package-private class
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: java
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13091


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/13091] invalide bytecode with package-private class
  2003-11-17 22:14 [Bug java/13091] New: invalide bytecode with package-private class tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-17 22:15 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-21 19:17 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
  2004-11-08  2:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-17 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-17 22:15 -------
Created an attachment (id=5155)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5155&action=view)
test case


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13091


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/13091] invalide bytecode with package-private class
  2003-11-17 22:14 [Bug java/13091] New: invalide bytecode with package-private class tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-11-17 22:15 ` [Bug java/13091] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-21 19:17 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
  2004-11-08  2:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2004-01-21 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com  2004-01-21 19:17 -------
Confirmed with mainline.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-01-21 19:17:26
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13091


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/13091] invalide bytecode with package-private class
  2003-11-17 22:14 [Bug java/13091] New: invalide bytecode with package-private class tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-11-17 22:15 ` [Bug java/13091] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-21 19:17 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2004-11-08  2:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-08  2:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-08 02:52 -------
This looks related to PR 5640.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13091


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/13091] invalide bytecode with package-private class
       [not found] <bug-13091-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2007-01-09 20:49 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-09 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-09 20:45 -------
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks.


-- 

tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13091


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-09 20:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-17 22:14 [Bug java/13091] New: invalide bytecode with package-private class tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-17 22:15 ` [Bug java/13091] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-21 19:17 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2004-11-08  2:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-13091-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-01-09 20:49 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).