From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-117492-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9308 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2004 13:55:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9251 invoked by uid 48); 8 Nov 2004 13:55:07 -0000
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 13:55:00 -0000
From: "nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20041108135504.18374.nathan@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18374] New: Argument and return value marshalling at tree level
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00901.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

This is a catch-all report to mention that we should really be doing ABI
mandated argument and return value marshalling at the tree level. These
operations can involve sign/zero extension (at the very least) and should be
exposed to the tree optimizers.

-- 
           Summary: Argument and return value marshalling at tree level
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18374