From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20974 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2004 08:21:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20773 invoked by uid 48); 10 Nov 2004 08:21:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041110082131.20770.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> References: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/14563] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg01230.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-10 08:21 ------- Ron, can you please attach your testcase that shows the problem to this PR? This PR is a regression on cygwin because the speed is back with 3.2. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ron_hylton at hotmail dot | |com Severity|normal |critical GCC target triplet| |i686-pc-cygwin Known to fail| |3.3.3 3.4.2 Known to work| |3.2 Summary|new/delete much slower than |[3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] |malloc/free because of sjlj |new/delete much slower than |exceptions |malloc/free because of sjlj | |exceptions Target Milestone|--- |3.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563