From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16942 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2004 09:10:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16880 invoked by uid 48); 10 Nov 2004 09:10:38 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041110091038.16878.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> References: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/14563] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg01231.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-11-10 09:10 ------- No its not a regression. GCC-3.2 built with sjlj shows the same problem. The "fast" version of GCC-3.2 that OP referenced was a "cygming-special" that had Dwarf-2 EH enabled. As I indicated ealier, this experiment was dropped because of problems with Win32 API callbacks and DW-2 EH Danny -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563