From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7219 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2004 19:47:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7194 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2004 19:47:16 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041110194716.7193.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041106212923.18322.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041106212923.18322.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/18322] [3.3/3.4 Regression] __func__ diagnostic in bad location X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg01283.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-10 19:47 ------- Subject: Bug 18322 CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc Module name: gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: jsm28@gcc.gnu.org 2004-11-10 19:46:34 Modified files: gcc : ChangeLog c-common.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: func-outside-1.c func-outside-2.c Log message: PR c/18322 * c-common.c (fname_decl): Don't use line number of decl in diagnostic. testsuite: * gcc.dg/func-outside-1.c, gcc.dg/func-outside-2.c: New tests. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=2.2326.2.685&r2=2.2326.2.686 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-common.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.476.4.9&r2=1.476.4.10 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.3389.2.306&r2=1.3389.2.307 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/func-outside-1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.2.4.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/func-outside-2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.2.4.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18322