From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-118094-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13647 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2004 08:43:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13442 invoked by uid 48); 12 Nov 2004 08:42:47 -0000
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:43:00 -0000
From: "jens dot maurer at gmx dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20041112084234.18445.jens.maurer@gmx.net>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/18445] New: ice during overload resolution in template instantiation
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg01503.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

This (invalid) code gives a nice error message with gcc 3.3.3, but fails with an
ICE on 3.4.3.  Using the correct ex.what() syntax fixes the problem.

#include <iostream>
#include <exception>

template<class T>
void f()
{
  try {
  } catch(std::exception& ex) {
    std::cout << ex.what << std::endl;
  }
}

int main()
{
  f<int>();
}


t.cc: In function `void f()':
t.cc:10: internal compiler error: in resolve_overloaded_unification, at cp/pt.c:9331
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

-- 
           Summary: ice during overload resolution in template instantiation
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: jens dot maurer at gmx dot net
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,niemayer at isg dot de
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18445