From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-119304-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6564 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 16:16:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6487 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2004 16:16:15 -0000
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041123161615.6486.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20041123151338.18628.micis@gmx.de>
References: <20041123151338.18628.micis@gmx.de>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/18628] [4.0 regression] miscompilation of complex switch statement
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg02713.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-23 16:16 -------
Works also with int:

========================
int i;

int main()
{
  for (;;)
  {
    switch (i)
    {
      case 0:
      case 1:
        return 1;

      case 2:
      case 3:
        return 0;

      case 5:
        --i;
    }
  }
}
========================


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18628