From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4656 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 19:22:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4604 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2004 19:22:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041123192234.4602.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041013220543.17982.schwab@suse.de> References: <20041013220543.17982.schwab@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/17982] [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg02738.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-23 19:22 ------- Actually the example in comment #0 does not fail on x86 or ppc, only ia64 because of the reasons I outlined. Now the testcase in PR 18632 has always failed, we just did not warn about it. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|target |middle-end GCC target triplet| |ia64-*-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17982