From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11905 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2004 22:38:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11823 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2004 22:38:25 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041124223825.11819.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041120062915.18576.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041120062915.18576.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18576] [3.4/4.0 Regression] missing jump threading because of type changes X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg02987.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-24 22:38 ------- I don't think this is "minor". We have many places where we have predicates returning "bool", and this PR suggests that we can never thread on their results because of casts. Adding Jeff, this may be a new prey for him after he's done with Bug 15524 ;-) -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |law at redhat dot com Severity|minor |normal Last reconfirmed|2004-11-20 16:44:20 |2004-11-24 22:38:25 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18576