From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17643 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2004 20:37:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17521 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2004 20:37:08 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 20:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041125203708.17520.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040715015458.16558.snyder@fnal.gov> References: <20040715015458.16558.snyder@fnal.gov> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/16558] [4.0 Regression]: bogus missing-return warning X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg03111.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 20:37 ------- Maybe we should do simple ccp for compiler generated decls which will fix this and most likely will improve compile time at -O0. Or maybe in the EH lowering part fix up the problem when we know that the finally_tmp will always be 0. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2004-09-22 18:36:49 |2004-11-25 20:37:04 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16558