public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "uros at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/8126] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Floating point computation far slower in 3.2 than in 2.95
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041126093846.17320.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021002075601.8126.o.lauffenburger@topsolid.com>
------- Additional Comments From uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 09:38 -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Hmm, 4.0.0 is faster and smaller at least on a pentium4.
The faster and smaller code is produced because scheduler is disabled for pentium4.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8126
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-26 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20021002075601.8126.o.lauffenburger@topsolid.com>
2003-06-11 22:41 ` [Bug optimization/8126] [3.3/3.4 " pinskia@physics.uc.edu
2003-06-21 1:44 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-06-24 13:23 ` o dot lauffenburger at topsolid dot com
2003-06-24 14:38 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-23 7:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-16 2:38 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-30 6:26 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
2004-01-01 4:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-01 10:25 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2004-01-03 18:39 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-23 16:58 ` [Bug optimization/8126] [3.3/3.4/3.5 " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2004-09-30 16:28 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/8126] [3.3/3.4/4.0 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-26 9:38 ` uros at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2005-01-05 21:53 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 3:35 ` ian at airs dot com
2005-01-16 13:52 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 9:08 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041126093846.17320.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).