From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17333 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2004 09:38:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17321 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2004 09:38:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041126093846.17320.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "uros at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20021002075601.8126.o.lauffenburger@topsolid.com> References: <20021002075601.8126.o.lauffenburger@topsolid.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/8126] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Floating point computation far slower in 3.2 than in 2.95 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg03179.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 09:38 ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Hmm, 4.0.0 is faster and smaller at least on a pentium4. The faster and smaller code is produced because scheduler is disabled for pentium4. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8126