From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12652 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2004 23:22:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12633 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2004 23:22:41 -0000 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041126232241.12632.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040527071518.15674.igodard@pacbell.net> References: <20040527071518.15674.igodard@pacbell.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/15674] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] [DR214] template argument binding differs between member and static fumctions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg03249.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 23:22 ------- Nathan's conclusion was that neither case was a regression (although both were wrong-code bugs). Should the "Regression" tag be removed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15674