From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1003 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2004 02:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 970 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2004 02:45:59 -0000 Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 02:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041127024559.969.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041125141837.18674.valentin@lrde.epita.fr> References: <20041125141837.18674.valentin@lrde.epita.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/18674] [3.4/4.0 Regression] G++ accepts bad elaborated type specifiers X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg03293.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 02:45 ------- This came in with the two pass namelookup. The problem I think is that we don't mark a as only accepting enums so we don't get an error but I could be wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18674