From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22292 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2004 15:47:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22275 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2004 15:47:33 -0000 Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041127154733.22273.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041127043006.18687.belyshev@lubercy.com> References: <20041127043006.18687.belyshev@lubercy.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18687] [4.0 Regression] ~50% compile time regression X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg03326.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 15:47 ------- Hmm, These are really short compile times to begin with. Almost anything this short could be considered just error but then again, the compile time for me on ppc-darwin was about the same time as 3.3 as 4.0.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687