From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32360 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2004 20:16:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32175 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2004 20:16:40 -0000 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041128201640.32174.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "zack at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041013220543.17982.schwab@suse.de> References: <20041013220543.17982.schwab@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/17982] [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg03502.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-28 20:16 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename You continue not to get it. In this context, DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME has been set because assemble_external has been called on the symbol. assemble_external is *not* a no-op on ia64. It emits a directive to the assembly output, using the name of the symbol. It is *not* safe to rename the symbol after that has happened. That you are not seeing a problem on ia64-linux is either because GAS isn't as picky as the reference assembler, or because your test case is not stringent enough. zw -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17982