From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19541 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2004 11:36:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19498 invoked by uid 48); 29 Nov 2004 11:36:35 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041129113634.19497.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041128181553.18704.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> References: <20041128181553.18704.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18704] [4.0 Regression] Inlining limits cause 340% performance regression X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg03579.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-29 11:36 ------- Honza is the one that plays with inlining, I'm CC:ing him on this bug. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18704