From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-120409-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10535 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2004 15:17:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10484 invoked by uid 48); 30 Nov 2004 15:17:25 -0000
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:17:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041130151725.10482.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20041127043006.18687.belyshev@lubercy.com>
References: <20041127043006.18687.belyshev@lubercy.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18687] [4.0 Regression] ~50% compile time regression
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg03818.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-30 15:17 -------
The patch to fix decode_reg_name is here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/
msg02683.html>, I don't know how much this buys us but should buys us at -O0 about 2%.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687