From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-120637-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7461 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2004 18:40:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7248 invoked by uid 48); 1 Dec 2004 18:40:32 -0000
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:40:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041201184032.7245.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20041201172930.18760.dpatel@apple.com>
References: <20041201172930.18760.dpatel@apple.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/18760] gcc 4.0 doesn't emit debug info for one of the files if two files are given on the same compile line
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-01 18:40 -------
Hmm, the problem is related to the specs says to delete gfull.
%{gfull: -g -fno-eliminate-unused-debug-symbols %<gfull }
but since we look the specs once per file, we remove the option for the first one but we don't have it for 
the second one.

Maybe there is a better way of doing this.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
          Component|driver                      |target
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-12-01 18:40:30
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18760