From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5743 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2004 14:06:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5704 invoked by uid 48); 2 Dec 2004 14:06:17 -0000 Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 14:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041202140617.5703.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041127043006.18687.belyshev@lubercy.com> References: <20041127043006.18687.belyshev@lubercy.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18687] [4.0 Regression] ~50% compile time regression X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-02 14:06 ------- Can you try again after my patch to varasm.c, I cannot get any accrete results on these tests. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687