public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "markus at oberhumer dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/18799] New: error: static declaration of 'x' follows non-static declaration Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 21:21:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20041202212109.18799.markus@oberhumer.com> (raw) This code used to give a warning on gcc 3.2 and gcc 3.3, gcc 3.4 does not warn at all, and current mainline 4.0 makes this an error. What do the C89 and C99 standards actually say here ? + cat x.c extern int x[]; static int x[2]; int *foo(void) { return x; } + gcc-3.2 -std=c89 -Wall -W -pedantic -c x.c x.c:2: warning: static declaration for `x' follows non-static + gcc-3.3 -std=c89 -Wall -W -pedantic -c x.c x.c:2: warning: static declaration for `x' follows non-static + gcc-3.4 -std=c89 -Wall -W -pedantic -c x.c + gcc-4.0 -std=c89 -Wall -W -pedantic -c x.c x.c:2: error: static declaration of 'x' follows non-static declaration x.c:1: error: previous declaration of 'x' was here + gcc-3.2 -std=c99 -Wall -W -pedantic -c x.c x.c:2: warning: static declaration for `x' follows non-static + gcc-3.3 -std=c99 -Wall -W -pedantic -c x.c x.c:2: warning: static declaration for `x' follows non-static + gcc-3.4 -std=c99 -Wall -W -pedantic -c x.c + gcc-4.0 -std=c99 -Wall -W -pedantic -c x.c x.c:2: error: static declaration of 'x' follows non-static declaration x.c:1: error: previous declaration of 'x' was here -- Summary: error: static declaration of 'x' follows non-static declaration Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: markus at oberhumer dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18799
next reply other threads:[~2004-12-02 21:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-12-02 21:21 markus at oberhumer dot com [this message] 2004-12-02 21:24 ` [Bug c/18799] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-02 23:12 ` markus at oberhumer dot com 2004-12-02 23:23 ` [Bug c/18799] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03 9:13 ` falk at debian dot org 2005-04-30 0:04 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20041202212109.18799.markus@oberhumer.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).