[Bug middle-end/18852] New: [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for stack growth failure

[Bug middle-end/18852] New: [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for stack growth failure

[danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org]

We have the following new fails in the C testsuite:

Running /xxx/gnu/gcc-3.4/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/compat.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-4 c_compat_x_tst.o compile
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-4 c_compat_y_tst.o compile
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/scalar-return-4 c_compat_x_tst.o compile
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/scalar-return-4 c_compat_y_tst.o compile
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-11 c_compat_x_tst.o compile
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-11 c_compat_y_tst.o compile
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-12 c_compat_x_tst.o compile
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-12 c_compat_y_tst.o compile

All these fail due SIGSEGVs:

Executing on host: /xxx/gnu/gcc-3.4/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/xxx/gnu/gcc-3.4/objdir/gc
c/    -c  -o c_compat_x_tst.o /xxx/gnu/gcc-3.4/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/s
calar-by-value-4_x.c    (timeout = 300)
^M
Pid 21061 received a SIGSEGV for stack growth failure.^M
Possible causes: insufficient memory or swap space,^M
or stack size exceeded maxssiz.^M
xgcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)
Please submit a full bug report.

-- 
           Summary: [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for stack growth
                    failure
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P2
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
  GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18852

[Bug middle-end/18852] [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for stack growth failure

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-05 21:43 -------
Was this before or after RTH applied this patch:
        * emit-rtl.c, expr.c, function.c, integrate.c, optabs.c, rtl.h:
        Revert the patches for PR rtl-opt/15289.

If it was before, then I almost think this is already fixed by this patch.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.4.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18852

[Bug middle-end/18852] [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for stack growth failure

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-05 21:43 -------
Make sure to have this:

2004-12-04  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>

	* emit-rtl.c, expr.c, function.c, integrate.c, optabs.c, rtl.h:
	Revert the patches for PR rtl-opt/15289.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18852

[Bug middle-end/18852] [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for stack growth failure

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca]

------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2004-12-05 21:55 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for

> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-05
> 21:43 -------
> Was this before or after RTH applied this patch:
>         * emit-rtl.c, expr.c, function.c, integrate.c, optabs.c, rtl.h:
>         Revert the patches for PR rtl-opt/15289.
> 
> If it was before, then I almost think this is already fixed by this patch.

The last change was:

2004-12-03  Eric Botcazou  <ebotcazou@adacore.com>

	* integrate.c (expand_inline_function): Accept non-CONCAT arguments
	for CONCAT parameters and invoke read_complex_part on them.

I'll retest.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18852

[Bug middle-end/18852] [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for stack growth failure

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-06 16:54 -------
Most probably already fixed, but waiting for the confirmation.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18852

[Bug middle-end/18852] [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for stack growth failure

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca]

------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2004-12-06 17:52 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for

> Most probably already fixed, but waiting for the confirmation.
> 
> -- 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING

It's fixed.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18852

[Bug middle-end/18852] [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for stack growth failure

[giovannibajo at libero dot it]

------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2004-12-06 18:34 -------
Fixed

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18852