public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/18100] [3.4/4.0 regression] template member with same name as class not rejected
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 05:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041208054807.10918.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041021205738.18100.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org>
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-12-08 05:48 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 regression] template member with same
name as class not rejected
lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07 12:34 -------
> Patch for 3.4 is submitted:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00450.html
(There is a typo in your test case; you meant "nested" instead of "ested".)
That aside, I'm concerned that this fix might cause something else to
break, and, given that the problem is only a missed diagnostic, I do not
think that's a good tradeoff. Nathan, what do you think?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18100
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-08 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-21 20:57 [Bug c++/18100] New: " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-21 21:02 ` [Bug c++/18100] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-01 0:46 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-16 10:05 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-16 20:35 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-16 21:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-04 7:34 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-06 10:26 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-07 12:35 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-08 5:48 ` mark at codesourcery dot com [this message]
2004-12-08 9:05 ` nathan at codesourcery dot com
2004-12-08 10:13 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-08 10:25 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-08 10:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-08 10:56 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041208054807.10918.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).