From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10958 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2004 05:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10919 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2004 05:48:07 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 05:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041208054807.10918.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041021205738.18100.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041021205738.18100.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/18100] [3.4/4.0 regression] template member with same name as class not rejected X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg01104.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-12-08 05:48 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 regression] template member with same name as class not rejected lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07 12:34 ------- > Patch for 3.4 is submitted: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00450.html (There is a typo in your test case; you meant "nested" instead of "ested".) That aside, I'm concerned that this fix might cause something else to break, and, given that the problem is only a missed diagnostic, I do not think that's a good tradeoff. Nathan, what do you think? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18100