public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/18911] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
@ 2004-12-09 21:09 hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:11 ` [Bug target/18911] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-09 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
With LAST_UPDATED: "Thu Dec 9 10:50:49 UTC 2004" I get:
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution test
No particular hint in g++.log.
The host machine is a Celeron 2.6GHz.
This is a new test, introduced between "Thu Dec 9 03:56:14 UTC 2004"
and above. Looking at the test, it seems it is simply a bit too long
execution-wise and at least not fit for simulator targets.
Does it really need e.g. in the order of 4e6 iterations to accomplish
its goal? Or can that number be divided by say 10000;
s/elt buffer[4111222]/elt buffer[411]/ ?
--
Summary: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure:
g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,nathan at gcc dot gnu
dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: mmix-knuth-mmixware
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
2004-12-09 21:09 [Bug target/18911] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-09 21:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:17 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-09 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09 21:11 -------
Hmm, the testcase was added so we could see that we could compile the program in short time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
2004-12-09 21:09 [Bug target/18911] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:11 ` [Bug target/18911] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-09 21:17 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-18 21:04 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-27 20:34 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-09 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09 21:17 -------
Re: comment #1. So, restrict the test to compile-only?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
2004-12-09 21:09 [Bug target/18911] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:11 ` [Bug target/18911] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:17 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-18 21:04 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-27 20:34 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-18 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 21:03 -------
Habitual reconfirm.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/18911] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution
2004-12-09 21:09 [Bug target/18911] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-18 21:04 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-27 20:34 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-27 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27 20:24 -------
Test passed "Tue Jul 26 21:00:09 UTC 2005"
Failed again "Wed Jul 27 09:56:50 UTC 2005".
This time the host is a x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu; amd64 2GHz, PC3200 DDR.
(no use opening a separate PR; same basic problem).
Smells like a performance regression. Or some cron jobs got in the way.
For the record, "libstdc++.sum 25_algorithms/search_n/iterator.cc" started
timing out too.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-27 20:24:00
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18911
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-27 20:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-09 21:09 [Bug target/18911] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/init/array16.C execution hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:11 ` [Bug target/18911] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-09 21:17 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-18 21:04 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-27 20:34 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).