From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15713 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2004 19:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15476 invoked by uid 48); 10 Dec 2004 19:40:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041210194036.15475.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rth at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041124222749.18665.skunk@iskunk.org> References: <20041124222749.18665.skunk@iskunk.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/18665] [3.4/4.0 Regression] -ftrapv borks up simple integer arithmetic X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg01547.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 19:40 ------- If addvsi3 actually performs addvdi3, that will be most surprising to everyone. I think that's a very bad idea. Since we are not invoking addvsi3, and I suspect it's impossible to convince the compiler to do so, I think there's no reason to provide the backward compatibility function at all; the symbol was unused and unusable. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18665