From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-122178-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6779 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2004 21:47:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6747 invoked by uid 48); 12 Dec 2004 21:47:06 -0000
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 21:47:00 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20041212214706.18947.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18947] New: [4.0 Regression] [non-UAAT] external inline and normal function of the same name
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg01711.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

Because 15398 got confusing I am filing this bug.
Here is the testcase:
extern __inline void f1(void) { }
extern __inline void f2(void) { f1(); }
void f2(void) {}

-- 
           Summary: [4.0 Regression] [non-UAAT] external inline and normal
                    function of the same name
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ice-checking
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18947