From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4005 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2004 11:44:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3979 invoked by uid 48); 13 Dec 2004 11:44:14 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041213114414.3978.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041210181625.18929.opensource@artnaseef.com> References: <20041210181625.18929.opensource@artnaseef.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/18929] Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on ARM due to missing frames X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg01772.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13 11:44 ------- I don't think that patch is correct. Please try the one from bug 3724: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/arm/linux-elf.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.39&r2=1.40 Also, please add a testcase if you want further investigation. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18929