From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8295 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2004 19:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8257 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2004 19:08:24 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041213190824.8256.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031030183500.12845.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20031030183500.12845.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/12845] [3.4/4.0 Regression] missed jump optimization X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg01843.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-12-13 19:08 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] missed jump opt > Dave, does the current mainline fix the problem you are seeing? > The mainline should propagate constants more aggressively > and eliminate those conditional jumps where we know which edge is taken. I could recheck but it probably won't be until next weekend. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845