From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2018 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2004 11:09:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1717 invoked by uid 48); 14 Dec 2004 11:08:57 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041214110857.1696.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041214104244.18977.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> References: <20041214104244.18977.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/18977] LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults with optimization X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg01970.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2004-12-14 11:08 ------- Same problem with -O1 . -O0 doesn't segfault. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|LAPACK test xeigtsts |LAPACK test xeigtsts |segfaults |segfaults with optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18977