public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/18977] LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults with optimization
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041214160657.26131.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041214104244.18977.Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
------- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2004-12-14 16:06 -------
My success with LAPACK is on i386-*-FreeBSD. LAPACK
dies a horrible death on amd64-*-FreeBSD. Your segfault
is a BUS ERROR for me. I believe this is a x86_64 target
problem.
--
steve
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18977
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-14 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-14 10:44 [Bug fortran/18977] New: LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2004-12-14 11:09 ` [Bug fortran/18977] LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults with optimization Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2004-12-14 16:07 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu [this message]
2004-12-16 15:59 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2004-12-17 9:30 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-06 14:43 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 15:43 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-01-06 15:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 17:01 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-09 4:53 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-01-09 22:59 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-09 23:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 23:21 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-26 9:42 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-26 10:00 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-26 15:26 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-26 17:23 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-26 19:08 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2005-01-26 19:46 ` [Bug target/18977] " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-27 15:09 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-27 15:25 ` [Bug target/18977] [4.0 regression] " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-27 15:32 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-27 15:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-28 13:48 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-28 14:29 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-01 11:13 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-02-01 21:32 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
2005-02-12 16:29 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-14 17:53 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-02-15 16:20 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-19 1:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18977] " wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-19 11:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-19 12:57 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041214160657.26131.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).