From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-122885-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22592 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2004 19:27:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22543 invoked by uid 48); 16 Dec 2004 19:27:24 -0000
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:27:00 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20041216192724.19042.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/19042] New: Complex types are not SRA all the time.
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg02418.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

I decided to look into sixtrack and noticed this.  I will add a small testcase after I reduce the problem.

-- 
           Summary: Complex types are not SRA all the time.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-darwin


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19042