From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12351 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2004 20:59:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12014 invoked by uid 48); 17 Dec 2004 20:59:43 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041217205943.12013.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041216140728.19034.jttoivon@cc.helsinki.fi> References: <20041216140728.19034.jttoivon@cc.helsinki.fi> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19034] [3.4/4.0 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:1633 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg02573.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-17 20:59 ------- Nathan, this was caused by your patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-06/msg00871.html Apparently we have a tcc_exceptional in the last switch statement of cp_tree_equal so that we hit gcc_unreachable. I don't know whether tcc_exceptional should be handled more gracefully or whether it shouldn't appear there at all. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Keywords| |monitored http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19034