From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-123056-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12112 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2004 23:50:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11987 invoked by uid 48); 17 Dec 2004 23:50:25 -0000
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:50:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041217235025.11986.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20041118185317.18548.lucier@math.purdue.edu>
References: <20041118185317.18548.lucier@math.purdue.edu>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/18548] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiles code generated by Gambit-C Scheme->C compiler
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg02589.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-17 23:50 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> We expanding this:

Yes it is, here is an small example of where we produce wrong code, I have to think of a full working 
testcase which we can run:
int *fff;
int f(int a, int b)
{
  int crcc = b;
  int d = *((int*)(a+1));
  int i;

  a = d >= b? d:b;


  for(i=0;i<a;i++)
   fff[i] = a;
}

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18548