public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/18813] New: not vectorizing obvious loop
@ 2004-12-03 18:14 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-03 19:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18813] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-03 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

We cannot vectorize the following loop because the "number of iterations cannot be computed".

int f(int *s, int *e)
{
  while ( s < e )  *s++ = 0;
}

This acutally shows up in SPEC (gap).

-- 
           Summary: not vectorizing obvious loop
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18813


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18813] not vectorizing obvious loop
  2004-12-03 18:14 [Bug tree-optimization/18813] New: not vectorizing obvious loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-03 19:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-06  4:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-21  5:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-03 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-03 19:51 -------
Oh, the problem is we don't handle non one increment.
Another example:
int f(unsigned s1, unsigned s2, int *s, int *e)
{
  unsigned i;
  for (i = s1; i< s2; i+=4)
   *s++ = 0;
}

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18813


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18813] not vectorizing obvious loop
  2004-12-03 18:14 [Bug tree-optimization/18813] New: not vectorizing obvious loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-03 19:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18813] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-06  4:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-21  5:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-06  4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-06 04:58 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-12-06 04:58:12
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18813


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18813] not vectorizing obvious loop
  2004-12-03 18:14 [Bug tree-optimization/18813] New: not vectorizing obvious loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-03 19:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18813] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-06  4:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-21  5:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-21  5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-21 05:44 -------
Note we are unrolling this loop now so that should help SPEC.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18813


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18813] not vectorizing obvious loop
       [not found] <bug-18813-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-01-29  5:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-29  5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-29 05:23 -------
The first example is fixed so closing as fixed, the second example I think has
been fixed seperately already.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18813


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-29  5:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-03 18:14 [Bug tree-optimization/18813] New: not vectorizing obvious loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-03 19:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18813] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-06  4:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21  5:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-18813-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-01-29  5:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).