From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29280 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2004 07:45:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29245 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2004 07:45:10 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 07:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041222074510.29244.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041204134716.18828.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041204134716.18828.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18828] [4.0 Regression] Extraneous warning with var_start and optimization X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg03205.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-22 07:45 ------- Note we don't produce wrong code with this example but that is because I made sure we don't but the problem is that we don't know that we should not prograte into __builtin_var_start. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18828