From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4146 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2004 19:48:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4124 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2004 19:48:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 19:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041222194849.4123.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "echristo at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040130124106.13931.bonzini@gnu.org> References: <20040130124106.13931.bonzini@gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/13931] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] combiner much slower on big basic blocks X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg03259.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-12-22 19:48 ------- I thought I did on the 7th. I'm not sure there's anything we can do about this. The behavior is correct and the previous behavior was proved to be not correct. If someone has an idea that's guaranteed to be correct in all cases I'm willing to try to implement it though. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13931