From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13841 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2004 21:50:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13799 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2004 21:50:22 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 21:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041222215022.13798.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041127043006.18687.belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru> References: <20041127043006.18687.belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18687] [4.0 Regression] ~50% compile time regression X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg03268.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2004-12-22 21:50 ------- Hope these two larger test cases will help profiling. 3.4.4 4.0.0 delta hashes100.c: -O0 3.7 3.8 3% -O1 6.4 14.5 126% -O2 11.3 18.7 65% -O3 11.9 19.0 60% infcodes100.c: -O0 7.4 7.6 3% -O1 12.6 25.4 101% -O2 21.4 33.8 58% -O3 22.4 34.7 55% -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2004-12-03 00:24:07 |2004-12-22 21:50:22 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687