From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1287 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2004 20:28:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1266 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2004 20:28:49 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 20:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041224202849.1265.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041224172149.19148.bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com> References: <20041224172149.19148.bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19148] [4.0 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg03489.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-12-24 20:28 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Is there any reason that's not a bad idea? s|bad|good -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19148