From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3598 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2004 20:32:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3577 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2004 20:32:39 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 20:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041224203239.3576.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jason at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041224172149.19148.bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com> References: <20041224172149.19148.bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19148] [4.0 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg03490.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-12-24 20:32 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed On 24 Dec 2004 20:26:38 -0000, "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" wrote: > Adding a post_p parameter to gimplify_cond_expr fixes the problem (and passing > it down to gimplify_expr) fixes the problem. > > Is there any reason that's not a bad idea? Makes sense to me. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19148